Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Sem Sath's avatar

I really liked the first part, and most of this one, but the Substack infomercial it pivoted into at the end gives me serious ick. Substack is chasing money just like every other platform; that they’re doing it *differently* (which doesn’t automatically mean better) is a cheap gimmick. Substack reward writers who marry themselves to the platform, not necessarily to their art—not to mention, they rely on the work of fascist scrawlers like Richard Hanania for growth and success. All of these different ideologies cancel themselves out on Substack, because we can just silo ourselves off from the creators we don’t like, and they can thrive doing the same thing with us, just like TikTok. That doesn’t make for a better world, or better art, it just makes for compartmentalized and commodified self-expression. Substack is much more like the Zone of Interest than the new Renaissance.

Expand full comment
Kelcey Ervick's avatar

Whoo-boy, this was heady and inspiring! I need to reread Benjamin’s essay, which I referenced in almost every grad school paper I wrote! One was about aura and mechanical reproduction in Virginia Woolf’s Orlando. Anyway, yes to everything you said here, including the potential of Substack. I was just reading Jess Row’s take on universities giving in to political pressures and this post felt like a good companion piece. Thanks for including me in a fab list of creators, and thanks for the insights and inspiration!

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts